S-01 · STRUCTURAL / FEA
Will it hold? A defensible answer, with the proof attached.
Finite element analysis of steel and aluminium structures, machine frames, welded and bolted assemblies — checked against the standard your approver uses, and delivered as a report an independent engineer can follow line by line.
- TYPICAL SCOPE
- Steel & aluminium structures, machine frames, welded and bolted assemblies, components
- DELIVERABLE
- Signed PDF report, utilisation tables, result files on request
- LEAD TIME
- Agreed in the written scope
- STANDARDS
- EN 1993 · EN 1999 · ASCE 7
- CONFIDENTIALITY
- NDA signed before any file is exchanged
- QUALITY
- Every report checked by a second engineer
01 / WHEN YOU NEED IT
Questions this analysis answers.
Structural analysis is worth paying for when a wrong answer is expensive: a rejected approval, a field failure, or an over-designed part you build a thousand times.
Every project starts from the decision you need to make — the analysis type follows from it.
02 / DELIVERABLES
What you receive. In writing, before we start.
Each item is listed in the scope document you sign off. Nothing on this list is a surprise at the end.
Technical report
Scope, assumptions, model, results, code check and conclusions. Signed and revision-controlled.
Utilisation tables
Unity checks per member, weld and bolt, per load combination — governing case highlighted.
Annotated result figures
Stress, deformation and utilisation plots with the critical locations marked and explained.
Model & result files
Neutral-format geometry and mesh; result files in Tessera format.
Verification appendix
Mesh study, hand-calculation cross-check, reaction balance and sensitivity to key assumptions.
Design recommendations
Where the margin is, where it is not, and concrete changes that fix a failing check.
Results review meeting
A walk-through with your engineers. Questions answered and recorded in the final revision.
Revision round
Re-run for design changes within the agreed scope, with a revision log in the report.
03 / METHODS
The right analysis for the question — not the most expensive one.
The mesh is refined only where the gradients are. Accuracy where it decides the answer, speed everywhere else.
04 / PROCESS & TIMELINE
From problem statement to signed report.
Five steps, each with a clear hand-off. You always know what we need from you and what you get back.
-
012 day
Scoping call
FROM YOUProblem statement, drawings, deadlineFROM USNDA, list of questions and missing data -
022 days
Scope & fixed quote
FROM YOUAnswers, load data, target standardFROM USWritten scope, assumptions, acceptance criteria, price -
037 days
Model & solve
FROM YOUCAD, material grades, weld/bolt specsFROM USInterim check-in: mesh and load-case plots -
042 days
Verify & check
FROM YOUNothing — internal stepFROM USVerification evidence, second-engineer review -
052 days
Report & review
FROM YOUYour comments on the draftFROM USSigned report, files, review meeting
05 / INPUTS
What we need from you.
- [✓]Geometry — STEP / IGES / Parasolid, or dimensioned drawings
- [✓]Materials and grades (certificates if available)
- [✓]Load cases and where they come from (spec, standard, measurement)
- [✓]How and where the structure is supported
- [✓]Target standard and acceptance criteria
- [✓]The decision the result feeds, and the deadline
- [+]Previous calculations or test data
- [+]Failure photos and inspection reports (root cause)
- [+]Weld and bolt specifications
- [+]Manufacturing tolerances
- [+]Comments from your customer or approver
The component is idealised with quadratic solid elements. Supports and load introduction follow the drawings listed in the input register (Appendix B).
Utilisation UC = E_d / R_d per member and connection, governing combination shown. UC ≤ 1.0 satisfies the check.
06 / THE REPORT
See the report before you buy it.
A signed, revision-controlled document of 60 pages on average — written for the person who has to approve it. Every number can be traced back to a load case, an input and an assumption.
- T1Assumption registerEvery assumption numbered, justified, and linked to the results it affects.
- T2Load-case traceabilityEach utilisation value names its load combination and the clause it comes from.
- T3Verification evidenceMesh study, analytical cross-check and reaction balance included — not just claimed.
- T4Reproducible modelSolver, version, element types and settings are stated so the result can be re-run.
- T5Plain-language conclusionOne page a manager can read: pass or fail, margin, and what to change.
07 / APPLICATIONS
Typical structures and components.
08 / STANDARDS
Checked to the clause your approver reads.
Load combinations, partial factors and acceptance criteria are taken from the governing standard and cited in the report.
09 / HOW TO ENGAGE
Three ways to work with us.
Prices are fixed per written scope. You pay for the answer to a defined question, not for open-ended hours.
Fixed-scope project
- BEST FOR
- A defined part or structure with a clear question
- INCLUDES
- Scoping, analysis, report, one review meeting
- TIMELINE
- Agreed in the written scope
- PRICE
- Fixed quote after scoping
Engineering retainer
- BEST FOR
- Design teams with recurring analysis needs
- INCLUDES
- A fixed block of engineering hours, priority turnaround
- TIMELINE
- Monthly, minimum term agreed up front
- PRICE
- Quoted per scope
Third-party review
- BEST FOR
- Checking an FEA or hand calculation done by someone else
- INCLUDES
- Review of model, assumptions and code check; written findings
- TIMELINE
- Agreed in the written scope
- PRICE
- Fixed quote
10 / FAQ
Asked before every project.
Something else? Ask it in the problem statement — the answer comes with the scope.
Which software do you use?
Tessera — the solver we build — runs the free calculators on this site today, each published with its reference cases. For project work the solver is chosen against the standard the result must satisfy, and named in the written scope. Every report states the solver, version and element types, so the result can be reproduced independently.
Can you work under our NDA?
Yes — we sign yours or provide ours before any file is exchanged.
Our data is incomplete. Can we still start?
Usually, yes. Missing inputs are listed in scoping, and every assumption we make is recorded in the report.
Do you sign or stamp designs?
Yes. All engineers responsible for the relevant engineering disciplines hold the appropriate professional qualifications and are duly authorized to sign and stamp engineering designs within their respective areas of competence.
How is the price set?
Per written scope: geometry complexity, number of load cases, and whether nonlinear or fatigue analysis is needed.
What if the design fails the check?
Following the analysis, any areas that do not meet the applicable acceptance criteria, together with the corresponding safety margins and required design improvements, will be clearly documented with their technical justification. Following implementation of the recommended design modifications, one re-analysis of the revised design for verification purposes is included within the scope of services and the quoted price.
11 / PROBLEM STATEMENT
Send the load case. Get a written scope back.
Tell us what the structure is, what it must carry and which standard it must pass. We reply with questions or a fixed scope.
- [✓] NDA before data exchange
- [✓] Response within 2 business day(s)
- [✓] Scope, assumptions & acceptance criteria in writing